Passage Three

听力原文

Florence Hayes is a journalist for the Green Ville Journal， the daily newspaper in town. Specifically she covers crime in the Green Ville area. This responsibility takes her to many different places every week——the police station， the court and the hospital. Most of the crimes that she writes about fall into two groups： violent crimes and crimes against property. There isn’t much violent crime in a small town like Green Ville， or at least not as much as in the large urban areas. But assaults often occur on Friday and Saturday nights， near the bars downtown. There’re also one or two rapes on campus every semester. Florence is very interested in this type of crime and tries to write a long article about each one. She expects that this will make women more careful when they walk around Green Ville alone at night

Fortunately， there were usually no murders in Green Ville. Crimes against property make up most of Miss Heyes’ reporting. They range from minor cases of deliberate damaging of things to much more serious offenses， such as car accidents involving drunk drivers or bank robberies but Florence has to report all of these violations from the thief who took typewriters from every unlocked room in the dormitory to the thief who stole one million dollars worth of art work from the university museum. Miss Hayes enjoys working for a newspaper but she sometimes gets unhappy about all the crime she has to report. She would prefer to start writing about something more interesting and less unpleasant such as local news or politics， maybe next year

Florence Hayes

Green Ville

Questions 32 to 35 are based on the passage you have just heard.

32 What is Florence Hayes’ main responsibility as a journalist？

33 What does the speaker say about security in Green Ville？

34 What do we learn about crimes against property in the Green Ville area？

35 What would Florence Hayes prefer to do？

听力原文

In America， people are faced with more and more decisions every day， whether it’s picking one of thirty-one ice cream flavors， or deciding whether and when to get married. That sounds like a great thing， but as a recent study has shown， too many choices can make us confused， unhappy， even paralyzed with indecision. ‘That’s particularly true when it comes to the work place’， says Barry Schwartz， an author of six books about human behavior. Students are graduating with a variety of skills and interests， but often find themselves overwhelmed when it comes to choosing an ultimate career goal. In a study， Schwartz observed decision-making among college students during their senior year. Based on answers to questions regarding their job hunting strategies and career decisions， he divided the students into two groups：maximizers， who consider every possible option， and satisficers， who look until they find an option that is good enough. You might expect that the student who had undertaken the most exhausted search would be the most satisfied with their final decision， but it turns out that’s not true. Schwartz found that while maximizers ended up with better-paying jobs than satisficers on average， they weren’t as happy with their decision. The reason why these people feel less satisfied is that a world of possibilities may also be a world of missed opportunities. When you look at every possible option， you tend to focus more on what was given up than what was gained. After surveying every option， a person is more acutely aware of the opportunities they had to turn down to pursue just one career.